Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Lahat Tayo, Iskolar Para Sa Agrarian Reform!



UP ALYANSA, Akbayan Youth - UP Diliman, and UP Organization of Human Rights Advocates (OHRA) present...

ISKOLAR PARA SA AGRARIAN REFORM: The issue of CARPER and Hacienda Luisita
Part One of "Para Sa Bayan" Lecture-Forum Series

with Former Rep. Risa Hontiveros (Akbayan Party), Dan Carranza (KATARUNGAN), and representatives from Hacienda Luisita farmers

September 1, 2011 (Thursday) | 1:00-5:00PM | Malcolm Theater, College of Law


MAKIALAM at MAKIBAHAGI. Lahat Tayo, Iskolar Para Sa Bayan!

Thursday, August 18, 2011

As PNoy defaults on FOI, Congress must now take the lead


PRESS STATEMENT FROM THE RIGHT TO KNOW, RIGHT NOW! COALITION


Kung talagang gusto, hahanap ng paraan.
Kung talagang ayaw, hahanap ng dahilan.


This is exactly where President Benigno Simeon C. Aquino III stands on the proposed Freedom of Information bill, which seeks only to enforce a constitutionally guaranteed right of the people to know and secure documents in the custody of government agencies.

The President says he supports the bill in principle, but that he has “specific questions and concerns” that he wants to be settled, before he endorses it as his priority legislation. His concerns, the President says, include his fears that FOI could unlock documents that might expose people to kidnappers, cause government losses in right-of-way cases because of property price speculations, and many other unwanted results.

Yet over the last 14 months in office, he has failed to answer and settle these concerns, and for as long a period, the FOI bill has languished in limbo.

A Malacañang study group on the FOI had told us about other, bigger concerns of the President. Through Deputy Speaker and Quezon Rep. Erin Tañada, chief author of the FOI bill in the House of Representatives, we informally and indirectly engaged the study group in constructive dialogue over the last six months.

Two critical concerns on exceptions were addressed over time in three successive drafts of the FOI bill that the Palace study group crafted – “national security” and the President’s deliberative process. These were in addition to existing exceptions in the FOI bill based on national defense and foreign affairs; military or law enforcement operation; privacy; trade, industrial or commercial secrets; drafts of adjudicatory decisions; privileged information in legal proceedings; executive session of Congress; and exceptions recognized in other statutes or the Constitution.

The legislative process practically ground to a halt, precisely because the President and his study group said they were drafting their own FOI bill. We had hoped that by the opening of the second regular session of Congress, the Palace draft would be done, and the President would have certified it as a priority measure.

We had hoped as much because we still remember: As the presumptive winner of the May 2010 elections, the President had promised to assign first priority to the FOI’s passage into law, and in June 2010, as president, he launched his government on the principles of transparency, accountability, and good governance.

This is the first time we are hearing that the President has new concerns about what he says could be the undesirable results of an FOI law.

The President assures us that he supports the FOI bill “in principle” but that because his concerns linger, he could not act on his own study group’s version of the FOI bill.

What seems like a state of principled indecision in Malacañang makes us wonder: Is the President part of the solution, or part of the problem, in assuring the passage of the FOI bill? Or perhaps neither, because he has chosen to pass up a chance to lead on a strategic policy issue that the Constitution has so clearly mandated him and all public officials to uphold and enforce – the people’s right to know.

The fate of the FOI bill was a leadership call on the President. We had not wished he would default. Yet because he has, we now refocus our efforts on the House of Representatives and the Senate, which should, without need for cue or advice from Malacañang, act now and quickly on the FOI bill.

We do so with eyes wide open that as it was in the 14th Congress under then President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, the FOI bill could face rough, tough sailing in the 15th Congress. While Mrs. Arroyo and her allies vigorously opposed and killed the bill before it could be ratified, Mr. Aquino and his allies now seem to want to let the bill waste away, and fade in time.


THE RIGHT TO KNOW, RIGHT NOW! COALITION/
BANTAY FOI, SULONG FOI! CAMPAIGN
17 AUGUST 2011



(UP ALYANSA is a member of the Right To Know, Right Now! Coalition, and the Bantay FOI! Sulong FOI! Campaign.)

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

ACLE 2011



Mga Iskolar para sa Bayan, kasama ka sa mga hain na ACLE ng mga kasaping-organisasyon ng UP ALYANSA:

UP Alliance for Responsive Involvement and Student Empowerment (ARISE)
UP Economics Towards Consciousness (UP ETC)
UP Lipunang Pangkasaysayan (UP LIKAS)
UP Bukluran sa Sikolohiyang Pilipino (UP BUKLOD ISIP)
UP Kalipunan para sa Agham Panlipunan at Pilosopiyang Pilipino (UP KAPPP)

AUGUST 18, 2011 (THURSDAY) | 1:00-5:00PM
Kasama ka sa ALYANSA. LAHAT TAYO, ISKOLAR PARA SA BAYAN!

Tuesday, August 9, 2011

UP ALYANSA’s Position Paper on the Proposed 2012 UP and Education Budget


UP Alyansa ng mga Mag-aaral para sa Panlipunang Katwiran at Kaunlaran (UP ALYANSA) is a duly-recognized leadership and service formation in the University of the Philippines – Diliman. Composed of students and student organizations in the University, we have been vigorously pursuing progressive social change in accordance to our four pillars, namely progressive multiperspective activism, academic excellence, student empowerment, and social justice and social progress.

Education, for UP ALYANSA, is a human right and a tool in the attainment of academic excellence, social justice and social progress. Through the acquisition of knowledge and skills from the four walls of our classrooms, our citizens achieve not only their personal development – be it intellectual, physical, emotional and social – but also civic and political consciousness. Since it gives empowerment especially to the marginalized, oppressed and powerless, education thus becomes an essential service that the State must provide.

The 2012 National Expenditure Program submitted by the Department of Budget and Management to the House of Representatives on 26 July 2011 proposes an increase in the budget of the whole education sector, from P218.9-billion for 2011 to P241.1-billion for 2012. Among the items in the education pie, the Department of Education (DepEd) and the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) receive a hike in their earmark compared to last year, while the Technical Education and Skills Development Authority (TESDA) and State Universities and Colleges (SUCs) suffer a reduction in its budget.

While the formation recognizes the marked increase in the allocation for elementary and secondary education, UP ALYANSA believes that prioritization of education should never discriminate tertiary education. This belief is grounded on our Constitution, which mandates the State to “protect and promote the right of all citizens to quality education AT ALL LEVELS” (1987 Constitution: Art. XIV, Sec. 1; capitalization added).

In the case of the University of the Philippines, the budget that is allotted to the country’s national university reflects the government’s policy towards tertiary education. From the P17.07-billionproposal of the University administration, the government via the DBM only approved P5.54-billion,or a measly 34%, for 2012. Compared to this year’s allocation, UP’s budget decreases by P208.2-million, or 3.6%, for 2012. This is not the first time that the University is given an insufficient budget. For the past five years, UP received a high of P7.1-billlion (in celebration of its centennial anniversary), to a low of P4.8-billion.

We, UP students, have a litany of reasons to complain about this decline in our budget: our classrooms are in an old and decrepit condition; our laboratories are deteriorating and ill-supplied; our libraries still lack subscriptions in online journals and scholarly publications; our researches and field schools are underfunded; our instructors and staff are atrociously underpaid; our limited student housing are already creaking and fire-/earthquake-prone; our vast campus is becoming difficult to maintain and secure; and the list goes on.

You, our duly-elected leaders, do not have any reason to shrug off our dilemmas. Section 22 (d) of the 2008 UP Charter explicitly stipulates that the revenues generated from the utilization of vast tracks of idle lands in the University “shall not be meant to replace, in part or in whole, the annual appropriations provided by the national government to the national university.”

As we face again an impending decrease in our budget allocation for 2012, UP ALYANSA reiterates its call for a higher budget for the Philippines’ national university. We implore the members of the House of Representatives to assist UP in fulfilling its most important functions, namely committing itself towards national development (2008 UP Charter: Sec. 7; the Charter even made mention that the Philippine Congress “may request the national university to conduct research or provide advice on any matter involving public policy”), and serving the Filipino nation and humanity (ibid.: Sec. 8).

To realize its aim to be the leading academic, graduate, and research university in this side of the world (2008 UP Charter: Sec. 3), we call upon our legislators to retain the P1.1-billion proposal of the UP administration for Capital Outlay (CA), in order to fund the following projects:
- UP Diliman Engineering Research and Development for Technology
- UP Diliman National Science Complex Buildings
- UP Manila Centennial Building and Sports and Wellness Center (Phase 1)
- UP Los Baños Analytical Laboratory
- UP Visayas - Cebu College Library Building Extension
- UP Open University Learning Centers in the regions
The government should not content itself with the recent rise of UP in international university rankings (e.g., Quacquarelli Symonds World University Rankings, Webometrics Ranking of World Universities). With stiff competition especially from institutions of higher learning from the Asia-Pacific region, UP still has a long way to go to catch up with the best in the region.

In searching for new sources of funding for UP and the education sector at-large, we suggest that the House of Representatives must carefully scrutinize and reduce discretionary spending, rechannel debt-servicing allocation to education, and legislate measures that will increase the tax effort of the government.

Finally, we re-echo the call of our national partner, the Youth Against Debt (YAD) Coalition, in legislating a bill that will automatically appropriate at least 6% of the Gross National Product (GNP) to the whole education sector. The proposed 2012 education budget, amid the increase, only amounts to 2.5% of our 2010 GNP – less than half and a far cry from our ideal budget. The 6%-of-GNP standard, first proposed in 1996 by the International Commission of Education in the Twenty First Century (headed by Jacques Delors), is considered as the UNESCO international benchmark for education and is already accepted by over a hundred countries. In following this international standard, the basic, higher and technical education sectors are now assured of the priority it deserves from the State without causing ill and irreparable effects to the quality and accessibility of education our people receives. In addition, this standard is in sync with a clear Constitutional provision that “assigns the highest budgetary priority to education” (1987 Constitution: Art. XIV, Sec. 5).

As UP, CHED, DepEd and other agencies prepare its respective budget presentations to the House Committee on Appropriations, UP ALYANSA will continue to engage our lawmakers (in both chambers of Congress) and the Aquino administration in the call of every Iskolar Para Sa Bayan for a higher budgetary allocation for UP and the whole education sector.

We, in UP ALYANSA, believe in the transformative benefits of education for our country. We maintain that unless the government increases the budget of its national university and invests more on the education sector, we will find it nearly impossible to attain quality, relevant and accessible education, lift ourselves from poverty, and uplift the lives of our countrymen.


INCREASE THE UP BUDGET, INVEST IN EDUCATION.



REFERENCES:

1987 Philippine Constitution
2008 University of the Philippines Charter
2010 National Account, National Statistics Office
2011 General Appropriations Act
2012 National Expenditure Program

Freedom from Debt Coalition and Youth Against Debt Coalition (2008). “The Neglected Generation”.http://fdc.ph/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=59&&Itemid=89 (Retrieved: July 31, 2011).

Office of the Hon. Ma. Kristina Conti (2011). “Updates from the Student Regent: On the budget campaign”. http://www.facebook.com/notes/krissy-conti/updates-from-the-student-regent-on-the-budget-campaign/10150247703715069 (Accessed: July 31, 2011).

Saturday, August 6, 2011

BUDGET WATCH UPDATE: ALYANSA’s budget campaign reaches the House of Representatives


August 3 (Wednesday): We gave out copies of our three-page position paper to 47 district and partylist representatives in the Lower House. Dialogues with some of these congressmen/women will commence very soon.

August 4 (Thursday): UP ALYANSA Vice Chairperson for Education and Research Aides Baccay and Buklod CSSP Circle of Individuals Rep. Migs Angeles witnessed the budget hearings for CHED and SUCs (including UP) at the Andaya Hall, House of Representatives.

That same day, we were also able to personally hand out UP ALYANSA's and Buklod CSSP's position papers to UP President Alfredo Pascual and UPD Chancellor Caesar Saloma. They both agreed to have a dialogue with us regarding the UP budget and other student issues.

Iskolar Para Sa Bayan, kasama ka sa BUDGET WATCH. MAKILAM at MAKIBAHAGI.


IN THE PHOTO: UP President Alfredo Pascual and CHED Chairperson Patricia Licuanan at the CHED and SUCs budget hearing, Andaya Hall, House of Representatives. (Photo credit: Aides Baccay)
Related Posts with Thumbnails